Postal Ser­vice

16/10/2009
By Dave the Rave

The postal ser­vice is a mono­poly that op­er­ates a totally un­fair contract.

A con­tract is entered into when a ser­vice is pur­chased; if any­thing goes wrong they are pro­tec­ted by legislation.

When rep­res­ent­a­tion is made as a res­ult of ap­palling ser­vice they in­vari­ably do not re­spond, pro­cras­tin­ate and prevaricate.

They do not know what cour­tesy and pro­fes­sion­al­ism is.

1)      In the last few months I have had thir­teen Re­cor­ded De­liv­ery Let­ters go astray, and un­trace­able. These have been pos­ted at Baker Street, (W H Smith), Trent Val­ley and Beacon Street post offices!

2)      A Spe­cial De­liv­ery pos­ted at Baker Street has now gone “walkabout”.

3)      A Re­cor­ded De­liv­ery Let­ter is not con­sidered “lost” by the postal ser­vice un­til after a period of fif­teen days; a Spe­cial De­liv­ery ten days!

4)      Yes, you can claim by com­plet­ing a form; a book of six first class stamps is con­sidered ad­equate com­pens­a­tion for a “lost” Re­cor­ded De­liv­ery; a claim for the Spe­cial De­liv­ery has not been made at this point of time.

5)      A con­sid­er­able amount of un­wel­come and un­so­li­cited bro­chures, leaf­lets, ad­vert­ising and pro­mo­tional ma­ter­ial is now de­livered. This is not the reason that the Postal Ser­vice was setup many years ago. The prime con­sid­er­a­tion is de­liv­er­ing mail; con­sequently light­en­ing the load of the per­son mak­ing the de­liv­ery. The lit­er­at­ure is con­fined to the rub­bish bin im­me­di­ately; there is an en­vir­on­mental issue.

6)      There is an “Opt Out” scheme on of­fer; how­ever this is con­sist­ently and con­tinu­ally ig­nored. No­tice this is an “Opt Out” not a choice by the recipient.

7)      The de­liv­ery per­son is un­der such pres­sure that they con­tinu­ally take short cuts across front gardens.

8)      Re­cor­ded and Spe­cial De­liv­ery items con­tain­ing highly sens­it­ive in­form­a­tion is con­tinu­ally de­livered to an­other ad­dress if you are not able to an­swer the door within fif­teen seconds.

9)      The drivers of the vehicles op­er­ated by the Postal Ser­vice gen­er­ally ap­pear to have ac­tiv­ated the self de­struct but­ton; so very of­ten the vehicles are driven in a cava­lier man­ner without con­sid­er­a­tion for fel­low drivers.

10)  Postal Ser­vice Staff, quite of­ten do not in­spire con­fid­ence. Their ap­pear­ance and at­ti­tude is totally lack­ing. Un­shaven, train­ers, shirts hanging out, un­kempt ap­pear­ance and with an un­help­ful and ar­rog­ant at­ti­tude; ob­li­vi­ously there are staff who are ab­so­lutely fant­astic, I sa­lute them and sin­cerely thank these individuals.

11)  Then there is the depriva­tion of local com­munit­ies by the clos­ure of local Post Of­fices. If the ser­vices are needed by reas­on­ably fit and act­ive in­di­vidu­als, it has be­come ne­ces­sary to util­ise the car, no help to the environment.

12)  How­ever, the main Post Of­fice fa­cil­it­ies are totally lack­ing in cus­tomer ser­vice since the trans­fer to W H Smith, (even is you are phys­ic­ally fit and able to get to the es­tab­lish­ment). In­vari­ably, due to the in­creased foot­fall, there is gen­er­ally an ex­tens­ive delay; it is rare to find all the ser­vice po­s­i­tions open and avail­able, even with sub­stant­ive queues of fif­teen or more customers.

13)  It is Senior Man­age­ment who is the be­ne­factor, not liv­ing in the real world but with sky high and ob­scene re­mu­ner­a­tions. It is totally ap­par­ent that they have em­barked on a path of des­troy­ing our Postal Ser­vice, whether by design or ac­ci­dent re­mains to be de­term­ined. Are these people mor­ally and eth­ic­ally bankrupt!

What ac­tion is now needed to re­in­state our Postal Ser­vice and her­it­age to its former glory; or it may be bet­ter that the cur­rent wave of in­dus­trial ac­tion is the fi­nal nail in the coffin?

© 2009 – 2010, Dave the Rave. All rights reserved.

One Response to “ Postal Ser­vice ”

  1. Bryan Yates on 21/12/2009 at 13:19

    I pos­ted an A4 en­vel­ope with three sheets of 80gsm pa­per in­side to a friend in Walsall. I checked the let­ter at a sub post of­fice, con­firm­ing the weight and dis­cov­er­ing that it re­quired a large let­ter stamp. So duly af­fix­ing the large let­ter 2nd class stamp, I pos­ted it in

    Lich­field.
    When the let­ter ar­rived in Walsall on Decem­ber the 14th, it

     ap­peared to have gained weight, per­haps par­tak­ing of a chip sup­per or a curry on route, which cost my friend a fine of £1:17p. If this wasn’t bad enough, my friend then checked the post mark, dis­cov­er­ing it to be Oc­to­ber 9th. In fact I for­got­ten that I’d sent it

    to him, and was about to send it again.

     

    I fail to see how the post of­fice are not mak­ing money when they charge second class post­age plus £1:17p to de­liver a let­ter which takes over two months to ar­rive at its des­tin­a­tion. One can only as­sume it was some kind of stor­age charge. Now I real­ise that 2nd

     class post­age is not what it was, but I think that two months and three days seems a little ex­cess­ive to cover a dis­tance of ap­prox­im­ately ten miles and then to have the ef­frontery to fine the re­cip­i­ent on de­liv­ery is bey­ond belief.

    I am aware that nowadays that the post of­fice send mail miles out of its way to get it sor­ted on the cheap, but this could have taken in the greater part of the West­ern Hemi­sphere in the time it took to ac­tu­ally de­liver it.
    Be­ing in my six­ties, I can re­mem­ber when mail was sor­ted loc­ally and de­livered the fol­low­ing day, in fact my father was a post­man in Lich­field for over 30 years, and I was Lichfield’s last tele­gram boy. Poor old Dad must be spin­ning in his grave at what has happened to the postal ser­vice today, if ‘ser­vice’ is the cor­rect word in this case.

     

     

     

Leave a Reply

Read This Before Leaving a Comment

Please make sure your comments follow our guidelines:

  • Use your real name, not keywords
  • No signature links in your comments
  • No foul language (please)

Comments that do not adhere will be deleted or marked as SPAM.

 
Please leave these two fields as-is: